It's 2010, and we've come a long way since Gottlieb Daimler created his first automobile design some 120 years ago. If one is trying to make a point about how advanced a 2010 vehicle is they can pull from a number of tired cliches. "Cars can almost drive themselves these days." Or how about, "Today's cars have more advanced circuitry than the lunar lander that got us to the moon." Or the more recent, "My car just took off, like it had a mind of its own!!"
Well, scratch that last one, as it's become more of an excuse than a statement on vehicle advancement. But suffice to say the modern car is capable of far more than simply transporting us from Point A to Point B. And with cars becoming so advanced who could find anything to complain about these days?
You already know the answer to that question -- me. For every step forward we take in terms of performance or safety technology we often take one or more backward in terms of driver enjoyment and personal control. I've touched on this subject before, but it's a good one and there are some new things to grouse about, so here are the Top 10 Automotive "Conveniences" I hate:
10. Death of the Control Dial: This one is pretty simple: When you're interacting with a vehicle feature that offers a range of desired effect you need a control that quickly and easily offers a range of response. For the young 'uns in the crowd, we used to have these controls, and they were called D-I-A-L-S. Ah, they were glorious things indeed. Need a little more volume? Turn the dial a little. Need a lot? Turn it a lot. Need to tune the radio across a large number of frequencies? Turn the dial quickly. Need to fine-tune the frequency? Turn it slowly. I know it sounds like engineering gone mad to the uninitiated, but trust me folks, those crazy dial thingies actually worked!!
9. One-Touch, All-or-Nothing Windows: I really like one-touch windows and enjoy the benefits every time I enter the Edmunds.com offices and have to scramble for my access card. At least I can hit the window button once and start rifling for the card while it goes down. However, when I want the window only partially down it can be a real challenge in certain cars. The buttons' detent between "one-touch" and "only-while-I'm-touching" is often imperceptible, so you end up jabbing at the button to get the window to stop its up or down movement, and it usually stops where you don't want it to.
8. Stupid Car Locks: An oldie but a goodie, I continue to despise cars that lock when I don't want them to, yet won't unlock when I do. Bonus points for all the cars that won't unlock more than the driver's door with the first press of the unlock button. I've gotten in the habit of pounding away on the unlock button on the keyfob as I approach my latest test vehicle just to make sure all doors are actually unlocked when I get there. Yes, I know the reason for this design, and I still hate it.
7. Keyless Start: I wrote an entire column on this topic a few months ago, so I'll just hit the highlights here: breaking the physical connection between a key and a car creates the potential for more problems than it solves. If you haven't experienced one of those problems yet...just wait. Bonus annoyance points if a car has keyless start when it doesn't have keyless entry. There goes the whole, "I don't like having to deal with keys" argument for keyless start, making this possibly the stupidest technology circumstance possible in today's automotive world.
6. Push-Button Start: I remember when this was cool on cars like the Honda S2000. It was an enigma back then, and it suggested the car was exotic and "race inspired." Now it's on Toyota Camrys, so the "exotic" element has effectively been nuked. Instead, it's become either an unnecessary two-step process to start a car if it has a key (insert key and then push a button), or a potentially problematic one-step process if the car has keyless start (see above). Ironic, because my Ford GT has push-button start. But that car is exotic and race inspired. Also, the key still has to be in the ignition to start it (so no misplacing it and driving off), and twisting the key will always, instantly kill the engine (ergo no runaway Ford GT stories). So, basically, push-button start can still be cool and trouble free. But it rarely is these days.
5. Shift-Brake Interlock: Another gift from the safey nannies, born of the Audi "unintended acceleration" (also known as "idiot driver") situation. When I first encountered this, on a mid-90s GM van, I was astounded. "I can't shift from park unless my foot is on the brake?!" I'd grown up consistently removing my foot from (but still covering) the brake when shifting my old muscle cars into a forward or reverse gear. Why? Because all automatic cars have a certain amount of "creep" built in and I liked the idea of letting the car move slightly forward or back when first putting it in gear to reduce some of the driveline shock that happens if you're hard on the brake. So much for trying to be as easy on your car as possible (this is when having some mechanical knowledge can be frustrating when you drive modern cars).
4. Stubborn Stability Control: This feature becomes mandatory on all 2012 vehicles sold in the U.S., though many already have it. Like ABS it has the potential to save thousands of lives every year (this is a good thing, BTW). Also like ABS, there are times when you are better off without it. For ABS, it's when you're off-roading. For stability control, it's when you're off-roading, on a race track, testing a vehicle in the slalom or on a skidpad, or even just trying to enjoy yourself on Mulholland (depending on how aggressively the stability control is tuned). On some cars you can fully defeat it (that's good), but on too many you can't (cough-Toyota-cough). This is particularly annoying when the cars without a stability control "off" switch have the most aggressive stability control tuning (cough-Toyota-cough-again-cough).
3. No Manual Option: Dual-clutch, electrohydraulic transmissions are more advanced than traditional manual transmissions. Dual-clutch, electrohydraulic transmissions shift faster than traditional manual transmissions. Dual-clutch, electrohydraulic transmissions are easier to drive in real-world conditions than traditional manual transmissions. And, last but not least, I STILL WANT THE OPTION OF A TRADITIONAL MANUAL TRANSMISSION! Honestly, I may not even choose the manual, depending on the car and my planned use of it, but I still want the option. Anyone who has experienced a perfect heel-and-toe downshift knows what I mean. Those who haven't...I'm sorry... BTW, Ferrari will not be offering a traditional manual transmission on the new 458. That faint groan you just heard was Enzo rolling over in his grave.
2. No-Use-While-Driving Features: A little hint for the engineers (and lawyers) working in the industry -- if you put an electronic feature on a vehicle you better figure out how to make it work safely while the vehicle is in motion. This includes not only navigation programming and placing phone calls but also pairing a hands-free phone or audio device. I might have let this slide a couple years ago, but voice recognition is too advanced these days to not allow drivers to speak any command necessary (destination address, bluetooth pairing code, etc.). This is where Ford is going to score big with SYNC and MyFord Touch in the coming years. Any OEM that doesn't figure this out, like now, is going to be left behind.
1. Lane Departure Warning: This is a tough one, because in theory I like it. We've all seen the deplorable state of lane placement and discipline as we drive around, so letting people know when they are drifting sounds good. But then I consider how lazy people already are in terms of driving focus, and this will likely make it worse. Also, with driver distraction on the rise this seems like a band-aid (rather than a solution) to the problem. How about this instead: Everyone out there just focus on staying in your lane.
I should mention that I'm not a total luddite when it comes to modern automotive technology. Quite the contrary in fact. Automatic headlights? iPod integration? Smart cruise control? I love 'em all, and plenty of other new-fangled features, too. As with so many things, it's not necessarily the idea that blows, it's the execution.
By technetium99
on March 30, 2010
06:30 AM
My biggest pet peeves are not new features as much as the loss of old ones. I want a keyhole on the passengers door, like all cars used to have. And please, please bring back the hand crank on windows, but find a way to combine it with power windows. Surely somewhere out there is an engineer who can invent a power window with a hand crank back up. Don't get me wrong, I love power windows, but I want a back up system and the complete control that cranks allow.
My favorite "new" car tech: one touch up on power windows. Easily ten times more useful than one touch down.
By NoSpinZone
on March 30, 2010
06:49 AM
What about the no-seatbelt beep!!
Completely agree on manual trannies. I don't care how advanced autos get, it will never replace the man/machine bonding that occurs when you can perfectly row your own gears in your car. Whether you are driving a Porsche 911 or a '94 Accord DX (my car), a slick-shifting manual makes you feel like you're sitting in closer to the former than the latter.
By seppoboy
on March 30, 2010
07:54 AM
Karl, this is one post I can't really find anything to disagree with, and don't have a lot to add. Great job!
In the early days of ABS the lack of an override switch drove me up a wall, I was glad my '87 Audi had one. Braking distances on gravel or fresh snow were ridiculous with ABS, fortunately the later systems have fine-tuned their way past that problem. I doubt that stability control systems will ever reach that level of improvement/refinement because they deal with too many variables compared to the braking system.
Although I really detest automatic wipers, and wipers that insist on making too many swipes when the driver selects the quick-wipe option. Those systems should give either a single swipe, or no more than three. Four or five are just too many.
By seppoboy
on March 30, 2010
08:10 AM
OK, one more for the list. Eliminating the dipstick and replacing it with a cranky electronic display is a bad move. Simplicity pays off, especially as a car ages and if its ownership changes.
By joemt
on March 30, 2010
09:37 AM
I'm with you 100% on no.3. The lack of a manual transmission option is most irksome, especially on cars that are marketed as 'sporty' or a 'sports car'.
You did lose me on the lack of 'runaway Ford GT' stories in conjunction with the 'Push-Button Start' gripe. The GT only came with a MT. I don't see how any MT-equiped auto could be a runaway. This should be another pro-no.3 point, not a no.6.
By blackadder5639
on March 30, 2010
10:11 AM
To add to joemt and Karl on No. 3. Even when there's a manual transmission option, it's usually in the most unappealing trims! So annoying!
By brn
on March 30, 2010
11:01 AM
Completely agree with seppoboy's windshield wiper comment. Let me decide how many times it's going to swipe.
I also want to give a shout out to Karl's #10. Since when are dials a bad thing? They give better tactical feedback and more control than buttons.
By rasldasl
on March 30, 2010
07:47 PM
2. No-Use-While-Driving Features:
The car already knows when you have a passenger so why can't it let your passenger operate the NAV?
By mirth
on March 31, 2010
09:48 AM
I really, really, really hate the "only unlocks the driver door on one click" keyfobs. Like you, I end up having to click madly to ensure my wife and kids don't give me dirty looks when they go to open the door. I understand the reasoning behind it (meh) but why can't they let me change it to unlock all the doors if I want?
By greenpony
on March 31, 2010
09:59 AM
brn, he's saying the disappearance of dial controls is the bad thing.
By verdi942
on March 31, 2010
03:02 PM
Every fob unlock car I've had can be programmed to unlock either one or all doors per click. GM even lets you do that yourself; Toyota sends you to the dealer. As for pushbutton start - my '47 Caddy and '53 Lincoln had that - plus a key to turn. The current fad a] sells well and b] is a giant safety recall waiting to happen. Also, BRING BACK THOSE D-I-A-L-S!
By mirth
on April 1, 2010
08:39 AM
Nissan didn't allow me to reprogram the fob either at the dealer or myself. Neither does my current Ford.
By ocramidajzj
on April 1, 2010
06:26 PM
Got to disagree with your assessment of the keyless start, keyless entry.
I love my Mazda 6s GT's smart-key and push button start. IMO it offers much more convenience than issues. Sure there are a couple of bugs, the most annoying of which is an overly sensitive proximity sensor that locks the car when I'm within 1ft. Still that annoyance is an acceptable tradeoff considering the convenience and coolness of this feature. I'll never go back to a key. Of course I don't forget my keys. I also don't let other people drive my car too often except my wife and she has her own fob.
By hybris
on April 5, 2010
05:04 PM
Besides the dipsticks you got everything that I would have on my list. I'm specially glad you made the manual trans a option because some of us do 100% city driving and a manual gets annoying real quick.