Edmunds CarPool

We'll Drive. You Fuel the Conversation.

Face Off World Cup: Mercedes SLS AMG vs Ferrari 458 Italia

FaceOff World Cup SLS 458.jpg

Round 2 of the Face-Off World Cup Tournament is a battle of the Alps. No, not Liechtenstein versus Austria (their cars are crap), but rather those two automotive powerhouses Deutschland and Italia.

Representing Germany is Karl Brauer and the Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG, who'll have a tougher fight this time around than was presented by Sweden. Coming from the land that looks like a boot is John DiPietro and the Ferrari 458 Italia, who managed to dispatch what would've seemed like a tournament favorite: the Bugatti Veyron.

So it's a battle of super cars to see which country and car ends up in the World Cup finals. Cue the vuvuzelas.

Opening Statements

Karl Brauer for the 2011 Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG
mb sls amg.jpgFinally, a competitor worthy of the Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG's all-conquering awesomeness. I must admit, the Ferrari 458 Italia is the first prancing horse exterior design I've actually liked since the 355. It's nice to have a lust-worthy Maranello sports car back on the market. But at the end of the day, it's still just another mid-engined, V8 Ferrari. They've been making this car since 1975, and they'll likely be making one in 2075. If you're a member of the Ferrari-of-the-month club ... well, first you should adopt me. But you'll probably also cycle through the latest mid-engine Ferrari every couple years with the same Timex consistency that Accord and Camry buyers exhibit.

Me, I like to keep things interesting in my garage. That means no over-exposed, over-priced, under-utilized eye candy that needs an $8,000 service every 2,000 miles. The SLS AMG is not the latest in a long line of gullwing supercars. M-B produced the last one over 50 years ago. And like all Mercedes-Benz products it's meant to be driven, because it's got the engineering might to cash the checks its low-slung body writes. Speaking of cash, the 458 Italia starts out a cool $40,000 more than the SLS AMG, and that's before the dealer adds in his own $40,000 "I-love-to-rip-off-rich-guys" fee.

The Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG: Higher durability, lower price, cooler doors. That equals one-of-a-kind value, something only the best supercars still offer.

John DiPietro for the Ferrari 458 Italia
Ferrari 458.jpg"Just another mid-engined, V8 Ferrari" That's a-like saying "Just another Victoria's Secret model." If it's not a-broke-ah, then why a-fix it? If a midengine design is outdated, maybe somebody should tell the guys who design Formula 1 racecars. And you want to talk engineering might? How about 570 hp and 3,042 pounds against your 563 hp and 3,573 pounds? How about a diet there Mr. SLS? You outweigh my 458 by over 500 pounds. So not only does the Italia have a superior weight to power ratio, it also weighs considerably less which of course helps handling.

I'm not going to argue the point about maintenance; of course the Ferrari will require more. But truly gorgeous things tend to be higher maintenance...just aska my mistress! But let's be serious, an SLS AMG isn't going to be exactly cheap to keep either.

As far as the price difference, you gotta pay for high art. Apart from the grille and front fenders, the SLS does a-nothing for me. A supercar should have more presence - the old 300SL had it in spades. But unless you're going to drive around with those fancy doors open, the SLS ain't got much. To me, it looks like a big bar of soap with fifth-generation Prelude headlights and an S2000 CR's hardtop. I know Daimler had a dalliance with Chrysler, but wasn't aware that Mercedes had a fling with Honda.

Rebuttals

Brauer:
The 458's weight advantage would theoretically serve it well in the twisties, until one (or more) warning lights flares up and it coasts to the side of the road as the SLS AMG storms by - basso-profundo exhaust at fill honk. I don't think new Ferraris are as delicate as the older models, but I can't see paying a quarter-million dollars with even the slightest chance of a mechanical or electrical failure lurking in the wings - and those issues still lurk with prancing horses. In today's world you can have it all - styling, performance and real-world reliability without ludicrous maintenance schedules and 401K-draining service fees - IF you buy the right supercar in the first place.

And I still say a mid-engined Ferrari is a supercar cliche while the Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG is a once-in-a-half-century engineering marvel. That means not only better value today, but better re-sale value tomorrow. In four years the AutoWeek classified pages will load up on 458s (just as they have on 430s over the past six months) when the next-in-line, mid-engine Ferrari hits the auto show circuit. Yawn...

DiPietro:
Though I acknowledge that older Ferraris don't have the best reputation for reliability, I would hope they've improved in that area in more recent years. Besides, just as so many Ferraristi have in the past, I'm willing to take that risk for the opportunity to pilot such a beautiful, fantastic machine. And I wouldn't be so quick to predict a rosy resale value for the latest Mercedes-Benz exotic. Remember their SLR McLaren of just a few years ago? Value sank faster than respect for LeBron James. Yes, a 300SL Gullwing of the 1950s commands big money, but not as big as a Ferrari of the same vintage. Have you priced a similar-era 250 GT lately?

But that doesn't a-matter to me. I'm looking at the here and now. I just a-wanna drive the one of this pair that's a-gonna move me more than physically ... though the 458 would seem to have the SLS beat in that regard as well.

So which car and country wins? 

Categories: , ,

22 Comments
22 Comments

By sabastian

on July 26, 2010
07:19 AM

I really like the SLS, but I love the 458. Go Ferrari.

Report It

By pushrod

on July 26, 2010
08:14 AM

The head says Mercedes, the heart says Ferrari. This time, gotta go with the head: I'd rather have a supercar I can actually drive and expect it to keep running, and won't break the bank keeping it on the road.

Report It

By dougtheeng

on July 26, 2010
08:35 AM

sls.

Report It

By ergsum

on July 26, 2010
09:57 AM

Art and architecture. Italy for the win. (German art and architecture is a little scary.)

Food and drink. Italy for the win. (I'll cede beer to Germany.)

Sexy, passionate women. Italy for the win. (Hi Donna!)

Eye turning, lust inducing cars. Ferrari for the win. (Although the Audi R8 is a step in the right direction.)

Report It

By ahightower

on July 26, 2010
11:26 AM

I accept the reliability argument and vote for the Benz.

Report It

By auto4fun

on July 26, 2010
12:58 PM

Since John's argument seems to be "It's a Ferrari, of course it's better!" I'm going to have to give my vote to the SLS. Awesome engineering, thumping exhaust note, everyday drive-ability, and (relatively) understated looks help drive this choice for me.

Report It

By zcalvert

on July 26, 2010
01:13 PM

Reliability and need for regular(expensive)maintenance are not the same thing.

Report It

By b_thunder

on July 26, 2010
04:42 PM

As a hardcore, 15-year long Ferrari F1 team management hater (yes, those team orders) and an even longer believer in a concept of value who thinks that Ferraris are some of the most ridiculously overpriced cars on the market, I have to say that, imho, the 458 not just wins this contest, but it is miles (or race laps) ahead of the SLS.
1. This ridiculously overpriced Ferrari is still looks/drives/performs a lot more like a true "exotic" supercar than also ridiculously overpriced MB.
2. Unlike the old SLS, this one , although may be lighter and faster, to me is just another 2-seat MB with a fixed roof. Another "SLK with funny doors", if you will...
3. Performance, technology, race pedigree: the cutting edge vs. parts from all basic AMG cars. Sure, AMG's got the "stuff", but only when compared to Cadillac and Lexus, not Ferrari.
4. 100% subjective: SLS style does nothing for me. The funky doors don't do much more than put a lipstick on this dud.

Report It

By brn

on July 26, 2010
07:53 PM

I'll vote for the Chrysler/Mercedes for purely superficial reasons.

Report It

By holzmank

on July 26, 2010
09:38 PM

Tough, tough, tough choice. I'd rather have a Porsche Cayman S (6 speed manual, bitte) than either of these over-priced beasts, but if forced to choose ... the Ferrari. Because you can get it with a real manual still, right? and b/c it's closer in spirit to a race car.

Report It

By mptlptr

on July 26, 2010
11:09 PM

458

Report It

By wrinklebump

on July 27, 2010
04:21 AM

Both are lookers, but the M-B is slightly less pretentious

Report It

By sabastian

on July 27, 2010
08:39 AM

"I'll vote for the Chrysler/Mercedes for purely superficial reasons."

Uhh...why do keep referring to the SLS as a Chrysler/Mercedes?

Report It

By jriz

on July 27, 2010
09:15 AM

The SLS started life as a next generation Viper, but it would seem Mercedes took over the project. However, having driven both a Viper and an SLS, to insinuate the Benz is just a rebadged Chrysler is patently ridiculous.

http://blogs.insideline.com/straightline/2010/06/mercedes-benz-sls-started-out-as-the-next-generation-dodge-viper.html

Report It

By sabastian

on July 27, 2010
11:30 AM

Thanks for the clarification, James.

Also, I really need to proofread a bit more. Last post should have started "Why do you..." Sometimes I type faster than my brain can think.

Report It

By editor_karl

on July 27, 2010
11:44 AM

hotzmank -- You can NOT get a traditional manual in the 458. Yet another reason I'm disappointed in the car. Yeah, you can't get one in the SLS, either, but for M-B to forego three pedals doesn't strike me as disturbing -- heck the original 6.3 only came with an automtic. But no three-pedal version of Ferrari's mid-engine V8? That's just wrong.

Report It

By brn

on July 27, 2010
04:14 PM

"rebadged Chrysler is patently ridiculous"

I wasn't trying to indicate it was a rebadge. I didn't say SLS/Viper. I was trying to indicate that there's a LOT of Chrysler blood in the SLS, hence the Mercedes/Chrysler.

Report It

By ne1butu2

on July 27, 2010
09:56 PM

The Ferrari hands-down. I know I should love the Merc because it's an expensive exotic with fancy doors, but it just doesn't interest me one little bit. I just don't think it's a very attractive car at all.

Report It

By holzmank

on July 27, 2010
10:21 PM

No real manual in the Ferrari? Change my vote! Seriously, if I have to have two pedals, then I'll take the better looking (with much cooler doors!) Mercedes.

Plus, I generally prefer German to Italian machinery.

Report It

By wrinklebump

on July 27, 2010
11:26 PM

Does anyone else find FR design inherently more attractive?

Report It

By greenpony

on July 28, 2010
11:00 AM

This is a tough one. My quarter just landed "heads" which means I'm voting for the Mercedes.

Report It

By nyccarblog

on December 23, 2011
12:51 PM

We just took the sls and the Ferrari out through the Manhattan Car Club. Here are some pics and another review
http://nyccarblog.blogspot.com/2011/12/my-new-love-mercedes-sls-amg.html

Report It

Post Comment

Advertisement

Archives

Browse Archives