Edmunds CarPool

We'll Drive. You Fuel the Conversation.

Face Off Budget Buy: Nissan Versa vs Smart Fortwo

FaceOff_Versa_Smart_01.jpg

It's Labor Day. Hopefully you're enjoying your day off. In honor of the prolific door-buster sales everywhere, we decided for this week's Face Off to debate the merits of buying a couple of the cheapest new cars in America. Senior Automotive Editor Brent Romans will defend the virtues $9,990 2011 Nissan Versa. His new foil, executive editor Michael Jordan (the lovely Bryn MacKinnon is now on maternity leave) says he'd rather have the $11,990 2010 Smart Fortwo. Per usual, you get to decide who's the biggest (or cheapest) winner.

Opening Statements

versa_faceoff1.jpgBrent Romans for the Nissan Versa: First, allow me to point out that the Nissan Versa just isn't a cheap car, it's the cheapest car. Not only is it the only car sold in America that costs less than $10,000 (without destination), it's also the least expensive car out there by a couple grand. Now, we all know that cheapest isn't always best. But the Versa is in no way related to some older el-cheapo disasters you might remember like the Yugo or the Daewoo Lanos.

With the Versa, you get a roomy back seat, a comfortable ride and decent power and fuel economy. True, this is the 1.6 Base trim level we're talking about. This is the dealer ad special, the one that has dinky 14-inch steel wheels and no radio or no air-conditioning. But hey, we're talking about cheap, right? Man up, dude. If you're hot, just roll down the windows (yes, you do need to roll them). Need audio entertainment? Hum to yourself the Love Boat theme. My point is that this is the cheapest way to get a set of wheels, and outside of missing a few features, buying Versa isn't that bad at all.

smart_faceoff1.jpgMichael Jordan for the Smart Fortwo: Next to the Smart Fortwo, everything else is a limousine -- a frivolous, overweight barge meant to offer seating space for people who never seem to actually be there. Since so much of our time in cars is spent alone, why not drive a car that's meant for just one? In the modern urban environment, the Smart Fortwo always finds a space, whether it's the weird lane over there next to the curb (which seems to appear and disappear depending on parked cars, busses, or crazy people laying in the street), or the half-size curb-side parking space right outside the dry-cleaners.

Everyone hates the Smart because it seems like just half a car. But from behind the wheel, this is a far more spacious, ergonomically sound, and Euro-stylish automobile than any conventional small car.  The upright driving position is totally comfortable and also offers great visibility. The package space behind the front seats seems small, but it's up to all kinds of errands except a run to Costco. And the three-cylinder engine is both alert and miserly (43 mpg in real world driving).

While everyone argues whether gasoline, diesel or electricity is the future, the real leap forward is being made by cars that are about less, not more. 

Rebuttals

Romans: I'll agree that there's an appeal to less is more. But with the Smart, the "less" is inherently flawed. Most notable is the automated manual transmission, which is incapable of making a smooth shift. And since we're paying the same kind of money here for a cheap set of wheels, why wouldn't you want the Versa's back seat and large trunk? Plus, the Versa isn't exactly hard to park; the Smart's smaller size only comes into play if you're living in Manhattan. Or Paris, where these dumb cars come from (better they should stay there).

Jordan: Sometimes cheap just isn't enough. It's true that the Nissan Versa is a screaming deal, delivering more utility for less investment than any car you can name. But when you drive a Versa, you invariably find yourself having to apologize for it everywhere you go. It's one thing to drive a car that's cheap and cheerful; it's another to drive a car that's just crappy. When you drive the Smart Fortwo, you're making a statement about personal mobility, not the relative thinness of your wallet. You're telling people that you're so weird that you might as well be from Paris. It all depends on what you think about small cars. Are they just cheap, or are they something completely different? 

So Who Wins? Vote Now!

Categories: , ,

9 Comments
9 Comments

By pushrod

on September 6, 2010
06:31 AM

I vote for Versa. While some people may rarely ever have a passenger, I have 1 or more often enough that I need a car, not a go-kart. With the Versa, I can at least take 1 other person plus 2 sets of golf clubs. Of course, if they added a club-carrier to the Smart, you could try to skip the cart rental :-).

Okay, not everyone golfs. How about being able to take another person and more than one bag of groceries? Being able to take 1 other person and some luggage for a weekend getaway, or multiweek road trip?

If you never, ever have to leave the city, never have more than 1 passenger, and get groceries by yourself (or have them delivered), and don't actually need to bring anything bigger than a purse with you, then the Smart makes sense. I don't fit that description, and neither do any of my friends or relatives.

Report It

By moparbad

on September 6, 2010
08:47 AM

Versa wins. Smart is a toy.

Inexpensive and built to stay that way is a slogan used by Subaru that is an applicable description for the Versa.
Versa sedan is inexpensive, it also is extremely functional with four doors and a decent size trunk, good visibility, comfortable, good fuel economy, reputation for better than average reliability, good fit and finish, and materials used meet expectations or exceed them for the economy class.
For examples of "cheap" I say to look to the Cobalt or Neon or Sebring.
Smart is a novelty with limited utility and a herky jerky transmission. It's appeal is to buyers with incomes many levels higher than those who are attracted to the lowest priced car.
Smart is purchased as second, third or fourth vehicle in a household.
Versa can actually function as a sole vehicle and will provide many years of service.

Lowest priced Versa is the sedan version not the hatchback pictured.

Report It

By ne1butu2

on September 6, 2010
09:03 AM

I've rented a Smart and they are fun runabouts. I'd consider one for an errand car, but not as my primary transportation. Under no circumstances would I ever consider a Versa. I'd even rather have a Dodge Caliber, which is sad. If money was the deciding factor, I'd buy used.

Report It

By yankeez

on September 6, 2010
12:15 PM

Honestly I wouldn't be caught dead in either one of them. For their price of entry, give me a 2-3 year old used car any day. The Smart is an ugly oversized golf cart that I'd be scared sh!tless to drive on normal roads with the other larger vehicles (especially full-size pickups and SUVs - let alone big rigs). Yes I know they supposedly have this great crash rating... but they still can't overcome the simple laws of physics.

And the Versa is... well... just flat-out ugly (like all the other new Nissan models, except perhaps the Maxima and 370Z - those are at least passable). I'd take a 10 year old Corolla than drive one of those rolling hemorrhoids.

Report It

By technetium99

on September 6, 2010
04:30 PM

Neither. Versa is a turd, ForTwo is an abomination. I would rather drive a used anything than either of these two.

Report It

By whoosierdaddy

on September 7, 2010
07:14 AM

So what you guys are saying is, do you want to be seen as weird and frugal or just plain cheap? Although either will get you from A to B, your life is sad if it comes down to that choice.

Report It

By brn

on September 7, 2010
03:45 PM

I'll ride a bike.

Report It

By slickersdrip

on September 8, 2010
08:48 PM

Anyone considering these cars is just dumb. Sorry.

Report It

By DLu

on September 17, 2010
12:15 PM

LOL I've never driven one, but I just saw season 5 of Top Gear and the way the "Smart" car understeers is just ridiculous (yes, the others were ridiculous too).

Report It

Post Comment

Advertisement

Archives

Browse Archives