GMC (21 Posts)
Here's Day 2 from the Fuel-Sipper Smackdown 3: SUV Edition. It was a miracle we ended up in the garage at all after St. Patrick's Day in Las Vegas -- but we had fuel sipping to do to find out which SUVs get the best fuel economy?
James Riswick, Automotive Editor
#NAIAS: Edmunds.com Editor-in-Chief Karl Brauer is in Detroit, on the floor of Cobo Hall for the North American International Auto Show. His day has been filled with the latest new car introductions, many of which he's captured on video. For your viewing pleasure, we've compiled a series of the big unveilings. Check them out after the jump and look for more to be added as the day progresses.
Let me make one thing clear in the second sentence of this column. I am not saying GM has already pulled off a successful turnaround.
But events of the last few weeks have established a momumental realization (at least for me): I think it's possible GM might actually pull off a successful turnaround. You know what they say, 12th time's the charm.
"Oh...um...sorry to bother you...disembodied OnStar voice. Hope I didn't interrupt any truly important calls."
That's my first reaction whenever I hear that OnStar "ding" followed by "OnStar Ready" in a GM vehicle. And that's why my apprehension level goes up when I see that OnStar button under the rearview mirror.
See, I like to think of myself as relatively self-sufficient. Sure, I'll ask for help but I have to really need it first. However, on a semi-regular basis, when I'm in an OnStar-equipped car I find myself unintentionally activating the system, which in turn causes tremendous guilt because I feel I'm bothering an OnStar employee who could be helping another driver, maybe even someone with a true emergency.
I'll give you a few examples:
Two weeks ago I wrote about GM's "May the Best Car Win" ad campaign, in which Ed Whitacre states, "Car for car, when compared to the competition, we win."
I questioned the accuracy of that claim, but in these last two weeks I've driven two all-new GM products, the 2010 Buick LaCrosse and the 2010 Chevrolet Equinox.
My experiences have confirmed GM unequivocally is making better cars today than it was just a couple years ago. Are they making "...the best cars..." that will "win" in today's ultra competitive market? Well...
General Motors introduced its latest sales incentive/ad campaign yesterday -- a 60-day money-back guarantee with a "May the Best Car Win" attitude.
If you saw the new commercial about this program (in heavy rotation during the NFL season kick-off on Sunday) you saw (and heard) a plain-talking GM Chairman, Ed Whitacre, talking about how "Before I started this job, I admit, I had some doubts." But Mr. Whitacre likes what he found at GM, and he thinks "Car for car, when compared to the competition, we win."
There are two key elements to this latest ad campaign:
1. Are GM's cars really as good or better than the competition?
2. Can GM convince a substantial amount of potential customers its cars are as good or better than the competition?
It doesn't get much more turbulent in the automobile industry than the last 24 hours, and a little birdie told me there's plenty more coming in the next couple weeks, not to mention the next 24 hours...
But for now let's focus on what we know.
We know Rick Wagoner is gone. It doesn't matter if you agree or disagree with how he ran GM. It doesn't matter if you think his dismissal was prudent change or simple posturing (one guess as to what I think). The bottom line is he's viewed as the man at the wheel when GM steered into the sun, and the president's administration wanted a "fresh" approach.
We know Obama wasn't satisfied with either Chrysler or GM's viability plans and has asked for a "do over" from both. The president seems fired up by the idea of a Chrysler/Fiat merger (more fired up than he should be?), but he was nebulous about GM's next steps. It seems "go futher" and "work harder" on restructuring is the only concrete takeaway.
We know the president left open the concept of bankruptcy as a possible pathway to viability in his speech. After the speech GM's new CEO, Fritz Henderson, reiterated the bankruptcy option and spoke of likely government aid to expedite bankruptcy proceedings.
Finally, we know the government is now guaranteeing the warranties on all domestic automobiles. This is good because it means current and potential new domestic car owners can be comfortable knowing the government has backed up their vehicles (versus leaving them "out to dry" on warranty work).
Add these indisputable facts up and I think we all know something else: A GM bankruptcy is inevitable.
Inside Line just published an excellent test
comparing a Crossover vs. a Minivan vs. an SUV. When you think about it, these vehicles really just represent a history of the family vehicle (though we left the wagon out). When minivans first arrived they were seen as super functional (and super cool) alternatives to the stodgy old station wagon that could carry the family around. Then came the SUV, which was seen as a way to carry the family around while looking like a rugged outdoorsman. Then came the crossover, which was seen as a way to carry the family around while looking like a rugged outdoorsman without having the ride/handling characteristics that felt
like a rugged outdoorsman's vehicle.
Last Friday's blog about the GMC Acadia versus Yukon Denali raised some interesting discussion points. The two dominant arguments were either:
1. The Yukon Denali is overpriced and unnecessary when the same division offers the Acadia; or
2. The Yukon Denali has more capability than the Acadia in areas like towing and hauling, and is thus worth the money
As is often the case, both of these arguments are correct, depending on your needs as a buyer. But this brings up the next big question: How much car (or truck, or SUV, etc.) do you really need? The emphasis on "really" comes from a phenomenon I think we're all aware of -- perceived versus actual vehicle needs. As such, I present the following two-step process to consider when buying your next vehicle:
I saw those 20-inch chrome wheels, the rear-view camera and that DVD entertainment system and I knew this 2008 GMC Yukon Denali wasn't going to be cheap. But the $55,000 MSRP still caught me by surprise when I finally pulled the window sticker from the glovebox.
It's not that the Yukon doesn't feel like an excellent SUV. The 6.2-liter, 380 horsepower V8 gets the ute rockin' down the highway, and steering/brakes are as good as any modern body-on-frame SUV. I did notice a slight flutter in the ride quality, but I'm not sure if it was 101 freeway expansion joints or an unbalanced front wheel. Seat comfort and interior materials are also first rate, and while the grille is a blatant Escalade knock-off, it does look good.
I've had ample seat time in all three of them now, but the GMC Acadia remains my favorite version of GM's Lambda platform.
I hadn't driven an Acadia for over a year after attending the press introduction in November of 2006. But the Saturn Outlook and Buick Enclave just never felt as good to me when I tried each of them, though part of me thought it was just my imagination. Now I've confirmed that the stiffer suspension tuning, cleaner design (inside and out) and cool features (like heads-up display) make the Acadia better than the other two.
Plenty of you out there already know this, but for those still stuck under the equivalent of an automotive rock -- you really should give modern diesels a try. I just drove a 2007 GMC 2500HD Crew Cab with the 6.6-liter V8 Duramax Turbo Diesel. This was a two-wheel drive version, and it was an undeniable thrill to pilot a diesel truck that can smoke more than it's tailpipes. The 365 horsepower is good, but the 660 pound-feet of torque is what roasts those rear tires.
Well, maybe not obsolete, but these Lambda platform vehicles (Buick Enclave, GMC Acadia, Saturn Outlook) are making all those SUV buyers, who don't really need SUVs, look foolish. Yes, if you really need to tow or you really go off-road regularly a Tahoe/Expedition/Armada/Aspen is better. But ask yourself how often you really do those things, and then ask yourself how often your SUV-owning friends really do those things. Most of you would probably benefit from the Lamda's improved steering feel, refined power delivery, advanced suspension tuning and (marginally) better fuel mileage.
The results are tallied, and it appears a change is in the air. For the first time since Edmunds started the Consumers' Most Wanted
voting in 2002 a GM division has taken home the most wins. Chevrolet scored with five models (Cobalt, two Corvettes, Silverado and Suburban/Tahoe) while Cadillac and Honda tied for second with four wins each. The Most Significant award also went to a GM product, the GMC Acadia...
The rumors started a few weeks before the Tundra went on sale last month:
"Psst. Hey, Toyota is going to launch their brand new Tundra with incentives!"
It seemed ludicrous to think the most successful automaker on the planet, and one historically loathe to incentives, would be offering them on a brand new product even before the dust could settle on showroom models.
Advertisement
Recent Posts
Fuel-Sipper Smackdown Video: Day 2
April 6, 2010 10:00 AM
2010 Detroit Auto Show: The Unveilings
January 11, 2010 1:00 PM
Talk Back Tuesday: Is GM Actually Going to Pull Off a Successful Turnaround?
November 10, 2009 6:00 AM
Talk Back Tuesday: Why OnStar Actually Increases My Apprehensive Level
October 20, 2009 6:00 AM
Talk Back Tuesday: Can GM Win its "May the Best Car Win" Challenge? Almost...
October 6, 2009 3:00 AM
Archives
More Categories
Rants & Musings
Vehicles
Links
Edmunds Inc. Properties
Edmunds.com Inc. Blogs